Reflections and feedback on Blogs

Research Project – Blogs
Your reflections and feedback

Please take the time to answer these questions thoroughly. The responses are both for you to better understand your writing, and for us since this is the first time we’ve used blogs in the classroom.

1. Describe the ways in which knowing your work would be public, able to be read by members of the class and anyone else on the internet, affected your writing.
It was helpful that my work was public because if someone had a comment on one of my blog postings they were able to give me helpful criticism that made my posting better. This affected my writing in making it better and more specific. It was also easier to go back and edit my postings.
2. Describe the process of learning how to create and maintain a blog worked for you. What are some of the particular challenges or successes you had?
In the beginning it was a little bit difficult to understand how to create a blog but after I started playing around with the blog it was easy to maintain and easy to work. I liked working with a blog because it was a totally knew experience for me. I didn’t really have any challenges with the blog which was good.
3. Describe the process of researching, using the various databases and electronic tools available to you. Were you able to successfully navigate them?
The process of researching, using the various databases and electronic tools available to me was fun and it was easy to get information and look back at information that was on my blog because it was all in one place. I was able to successfully navigate these.
4. Describe your work with the final presentation. Do you feel like you were able to fully express your thoughts and ideas? Were there things you wanted to do but couldn’t because of the software? Are there other ideas you have for what you would have liked to do?
I liked the final presentation because it was like an over view of all the ideas and thoughts I had on my project. I felt like I was able to fully express my ideas and thoughts because everything that I wanted to use did not interfere with the software. I do not have other ideas of what I would have liked to do for the final presentation and I actually really enjoyed the final presentation because we were able to structure it any way that we wanted to.
5. How would you describe the connection between what you learned during these past three weeks and the ways you were asked to read, write, and present about it? In what ways was this more effective or more challenging or otherwise different from or similar to the ways we usually work in this class?
It was a good connection between these two things because it was easy to find information and it was nice that I only needed the internet to fulfill my blog. I liked doing this was with reading something then writing about it then presenting about it better because it was something different. This way is more effective because it was way easier to look at other peoples work and learn more than I think we would have in class. Something that was challenging was that sometimes the internet ran slowly and it was hard to post some things.
6. Do you feel like you received adequate assistance during the process? Were the different steps explained to you? Did you receive help and guidance that helped you to be successful?
Yes, I felt like I received adequate assistance during this process because whenever I had a problem with something, I could just go on the class blog and their were instructions on what to do which was nice and the instructions were always very specific and not confusing at all. Yes, I did receive help and guidance that helped me be successful.
7. What else should we know about this process for you? Is this the kind of thing you want to do more of during class? What ideas do you have for how to use blogs in our class in the future? Do you plan on maintaining your blog?
I liked this process and it was something different and something I have never done before. Also, I feel like it helps us more in the “real world” because it’s something that we might have to do again. It’s something I would like to do again. Some new ideas for using blogs in the future are that we could maybe use this blogging idea for a book we read in class. I might maintain my blog if I have the time to do so.

Third response to Danielles Blog

The last blog that I looked at Danielle's Blog. Her topic was religion. I liked the way she introduced her topic on her slide show. In the begininning of her slide show, it talks about how the United States of America is one of the most religiously diverse countries throughout the world. She says in the introduction of her slide show that United States is dealing with the challenge that people are entitled to their own beliefs, yet those same people are not willing to accept the choices and beliefs of others. There is a difficult and necessary goal that American's need to work towards: Religious Tolerance. Then the next slide talks about how Americas independence was motivated by religious freedom. This was interesting to read about because its cool to connect back on how America does try to be as free as they can. On the next slide, there was a pie chart that showed all the different religions in the United States and had a controdiction between people that believed in Religion and people who were atheist. In general, both of the ideas make sense. It was interesting to see how many people were catholic and buddist and muslim and jewish in the United States and it shows how much diversity the United States has. There was a picture that was interesting on Danielles Blog with a quote. The quote said, " Religios freedom means any religion". I found this quote to be interesting because it made me think that this quote was trying to say that there will only be religious feedom if people accept the other religions around the world. There was a youtube video that I found interesting on Danielles blog. It talked about Coexist which I've heard about before but, ever really learned and knew what it was. Coexist is when People are making more conscious efforts to coexist with one another, and learn to tolerate other religions that do not necessarily agree with their own ideas. This was interseting to watch a youtube video on and interseting to see what the coexist was because I always wondered about it. Overall, it was interesting to see how Danielles blog talked about the differences between atheists and people who believe in religion.

Second Response to Thoughts of Kolis

The next blog that I looked at was Thoughts of Kolis. I never really knew anything about his topic and his topic was about how an artist affects a listener by not only by their music but also on the actions that they portray and that this could influence the listener. He talked about the history of hip hop and it really intersted in reading about it. In his slide show he talked about how in the 1970's hip hop was credited with reducing violence and giving an alternative to violence but then his slide show said that all that changed in the 1990's hip hop emerged which was centered around violence and drugs.With this new form of hip hop, the connection between rap and violence emerged. I find this very interesting and I never knew that there were two types of hip hops and its intersting to see why and how hip hop changed. In one of the youtube videos that were shown on the slide show, it talked about how having a gun shows a sign of masculinity and this was influenced from the rap that artists rap. This shows a negative influence on rap because it could create people to be violent. He then had a slide about black celebrities like Oprah and Russel Simmons and how they think its best to change the lyrics to their music which is a conteversial concept because people may believe that by changing the lyrics to their music there will be a postive influence to the society. The artists then responded to this idea and they said that their cds would not sell because their idea and image is a ganster and people like that. I found this to be very interesting to read about and I never really thought about how Rap does have an influence on violence. Also it was intersting to see rappers that dont base their ideas on just violence like Lupe Fiasco which I thought was good. Also he brought up the focus and topic that music isnt the only issue He brings up the point and says that the problem is also our society and how we live. Music isn't the only thing that is violent in our society, so are movies and television shows.

First Response to Thoughts of Yesturday

The first blog that I looked at was Thoughts of Yesterday. This persons topic was about Gays and Lesbians which connects to my topic because I had the same one. I wanted to look at what another person focused their ideas on and learn even more about Gays and Lesbians that I did not know before. I first looked at the slide show that was posted on this blog. I first looked at the slide show and the first youtube video really caught my attention. There was a picture of a church that this guy painted and on the painting it said "I hate my parents for raising me into a religion that taught me to hate myself". This was sad to read and it was interesting to look at how Gays and Lesbians were also discriminated against their religion also. When I researched about Gays and Lesbians, I didnt really focus on the religion part of it which was a new topic for me to learn about in Thoughts of Yesturday. Also in a youtube video, there was a paiting of a person sitting and there was a quote on the picture that said, "I once left a 50% tip because the server treated my partner and I like we were human". I found this to be sad because people dont treat people like humans based on their sexuality which is sad. I focused on this idea also of discriminating against Gays so it was nice to see that Thoughts on Yesturday encorporated that idea. Thoughts on Yesturday also talked about the Stonewall riots which I had read about but something different that she did was include a youtube video on the Stonewall riots and I learned even more information about the Stonewall Riots which i found was helpful. Something that i learned more about was the Day of Silence which I found really interesting because I did not write about that at all and i learned a little bit about that too on Thoughts on Yesturday. When I was reading the current event portion of Thoughts on Yesturday, she talked about Lambert’s performance and how it was such a controversal topic. Thoughts on Yesturday talks about how it brought up so much controversy was that it was a representation of homosexuality. When I was reading this it was very interesting and it was something I never talked about in my blog so it was good to see where another person took the topic of "Gays and Lesbians" in a different way.

Works Cited Page

American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 28 Jan. 2010.

American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.

"Barney Frank." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.

Beatrix Kiddo. “U.S. Government Reconsiders Dont ask Dont tell policy for the military .” lifestyle.com. 2/2/10. 2/2/10. .

Craig Whitlock and Michael D. Shear. “Military scaling back 'dont ask dont tell.” WashingtonPost.2/2/10. Web. 2/3/10. .

Ellen Howard. Am I Blue?. New York, 1999.

Mark Thompson. “Dont ask, Dont tell turns 15.” Time.com. 1/28/08. 2/4/10. .

McFadden, David. "Gays Live--and Die--in Fear in Jamaica." Miami Herald (Miami, FL) 20 Jul 2009: n.p. SIRS Researcher. Web. 02 February 2010

Michel Martin. “Future of 'Dont ask,Dont tell' policy.” npr.org. , 2/3/10. 2/4/10. .

Stonewall riots." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 29 Jan. 2010.

ALL IMAGES ARE FROM GOOGLE IMAGES

Current Event of Analitical Study for Gays and Lesbians

The approach of the situation that was researched for a current event was the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy which prohibits Gays and Lesbians that want to serve in the army are allowed to, if they do not tell people that they are gay or lesbian. But, if someone finds out that they are, they are kicked out of the military immediately. The two obvious different perspectives were people that agreed with this policy and people that disagreed with this policy.
First off, the background of this policy came in 1993 from Clinton while he was serving as president. In the article, “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” turns 15, it says, “It was 15 years ago, Tuesday, that President Clinton rolled out the policy that came to be known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which relaxed the long-standing bar against gay men and women serving in the U.S. military. While the move was initially hailed as progress for the rights of gays in the military”. This describes what the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy was made for because before 1993, Gays and Lesbians did not have the right to serve in the military. "Don’t ask, Don’t tell" policy is that about 12,000 service members have been booted from the military since the law took effect, including dozens of Arabic speakers whose skills are particularly prized by the military since the advent of the war on terror. This shows that because people talk and tell about their sexual orientation, they get kicked out of the military. Now in current events, they talk about if this law should be changed or not. The agreeing view side that agrees that the law should be changed for this subject says that by kicking someone out, based on their sexual preference, it is wrong and unjust. The opposing side that thinks that this law should not be changed thinks that if this law is changed, things in the army will get out of control.
Starting off with the opposing view side of this issue, in the article, it talks about this women that is named Ms. Elaine Donnelly (President, Center For Military Readiness) she thinks that changing the current policy would hurt the morale of the troops so, she strongly disagrees with changing the law. She says that if this law changes, soldiers will not re-enlist if the law is repealed. She also talks about how this is not a religious issue and she thinks that it’s very rational and not prejudice to have the "Don’t ask, Don’t tell policy. Ms. Donelly says, 'The weakest argument going, because of racial separation and prejudice was irrational and it still is. The military took it on head-on because it was irrational and we needed those good soldiers who are already in the military; they just had to attack the prejudice. However, separation of men and women in the military, in areas involving sexual privacy is not only rational; it is desirable and certainly customary in the civilian world as well as the military. The two cannot be equated. They are not the same".
With the agreeing view point of this issue, the article named U.S. Government reconsiders “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy for the military. This article talked about how Obama wants to change the law of "Don’t ask, Don’t tell" policy and they want to change this law because many people are losing their job to serve in the army so in this article, the view point is on the side where they agree with changing the "Don’t ask, Don’t tell" Policy. The author of the article says, “There is a school of thought which believes should the United States military allow its homosexual members to serve openly it will somehow deteriorate the long standing moral fibers of the organization. I have a hard time with this logic and I have had discussions with various service members regarding the moral codes of the United States military and they are so grossly outdated I don't know if anyone in this day and age can maintain them. You have a younger generation of soldiers trying to live up to codes set by men who existed in a totally different time, place and society".

Literature for Analytical Part of Gays and Lesbians

The story that was read was called, “Running”, by Ellen Howard. In this story there were many characters but the characters that the story specifically focused on was a lesbian girl named Sheila that was not accepted by her parents and a girl named Terry that is a bit different from others The context of the story is it is about a girl named Terry. Terry is a teenager and she has a best friend named Maggie. Also, she has a sister named Heather. Heather is in college and her parents let to go to Europe. When Heather comes back, she asks her parents if she could bring a friend back with her because her friend is having problems at her house and she got kicked out of her house because of her parents. When the family is at the air port they realize that Heathers friend is a lesbian but, they still accept her into their home. Sheila, Heathers friend, is really sweet and her parents kicked her out of the house because they found of she was a lesbian. This brings up many points to what has been researched and how Lesbians and Gays don’t feel accepted into their community because what they are doing is “wrong”. Continuing on with the context of this short story, Terry is first afraid to get to know Sheila because Terry thinks Sheila is beautiful. Terry finally starts to get to know Sheila and she really starts to like her because she is different and understands her. In the story, Terry gets upset about her best friend not coming to camp with her because she chose her boyfriend and Sheila was there to comfort her. Sheila shows Terry that it’s okay to be upset and that it’s okay to be different. For example, the last lines of this short story were, “And then she shipped through the door, leaving me outside. But the door was open. If I had the courage, I could follow"(101). This quote shows that everyone is different and to really fully understand yourself, a person has to be brave and accept who they really are. In this example, Sheila walked into Terry’s house and Sheila recognized that Terry was also lesbian and if she wanted to, she could follow and accept herself for who she really is. A problem in today’s world is that people that are Gay and Lesbian are afraid to admit it to them because of the way society rejects it. Society in this story rejected it in the way that Sheila’s parents kicked her out of her own house. So sometimes, its hard for people who are lesbian and gay to admit it, because of the negativity the society gives on the topic. The last sentence of this short story was saying that a person should always stick to being himself even if it’s a little different than other people. The perspective that this short story was written in a person that was confused about their sexuality and in the story it showed that it was okay and even sometimes better for someone to be different. This written expression adds to the definition of the theme in the way that its different than most but that in the end, it’s okay to be different. Also, the context of this short story showed that Gay and Lesbians are people with feelings and emotions and that they are not totally different than the "normal" person and that they just are attracted to the same sex. This short story connects to the real world in the way that people still feel this way and sometimes are afraid to be true to themselves. In this society, being Gay and Lesbian is considered as to being strange and weird. So, if a person is Lesbian or Gay which is something they cannot help, they will hide it and feel a sort of emptiness all their life. If this society accepted Gays and Lesbians, people wouldn’t be missing that part of their identity.

Background for Analitical Part of Gays and Lesbians

In all the background that was done, there were a lot of different things that Gays and Lesbians that were talked about. The background information of Gays and Lesbians talked about the first organizations that were formed, laws that were specifically created for Gays and Lesbians in order to hurt and help them, and people who did something to benefit Gays and Lesbians.
The first background information that was done was the history of Gays and Lesbians in America. In the 1930’s people believed being gay was a mental disability and in the article of Gay Rights, it says, “Homosexuality became linked in the popular mind to a criminal underworld populated by prostitutes, child molesters, and murderers". This was said also around the 1930’s. In the article it talked more about the 1960’s and that was when Gays and Lesbians started to get their rights. In the article it says, “Although the success of gays and lesbians in securing civil rights has increased markedly since the 1970s after activists began to challenge federal and state laws, aspects of homosexual behavior remained criminalized in many parts of the United States until the landmark decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which ruled antisodomy laws unconstitutional”. This shows that still to this day, Gays and Lesbians aren’t yet equal.
Next, some background was done about the stonewall riots and they were the first time Gays and Lesbians protested against letting them stay in the same bar. This information was taken from the article, Stonewall Riots. What happened was that they got kicked out because they were gay and got escorted out and the next day, Gays, Lesbians, women and men protested and marched against this. In the article it says,” When they moved against the Stonewall Inn, they expected that homosexuals would simply take their arrests without complaint, as they had usually done in the past. This time, however, gays fought back rather than submit, and a melee resulted in injuries to four policemen." This shows that Gays were actually doing something. In the protest for this, there were over 400 young men and women and they chanted “gay power”. This was the first time in the United States that Gays fought back and because of this, homosexuals formed the Gay Liberation Front and that demanded an end to discrimination based on sexual preferences. This is exciting because it is the first time Gays and Lesbians fight for their rights to stay in the bar. This was a changing point in society because after this happened and Gay Pride week has always fallen on the week at which the Stonewall Riots happened.
Next, some background information was done about Barney Frank and he was just a guy that was in congress and helped out the Gays and Lesbians because he himself was gay himself. He was very successful in his term of power. This was found in the article, Barnet Frank.
Last but not least, there was an article about the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy which was created by Clinton in 1993. This law has still not been change and what this law states is that, “forbids homosexuals in the military from revealing their sexual orientation and others from asking about it. Although it established the right of gays and lesbians to serve in the military, it went away from who they really were and had to hide something that shouldn’t be needed to be hidden. Also the new policy forbade them to participate in overtly homosexual activities, to proselytize for the gay lifestyle, or to acknowledge their own sexual preference”.

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turns 15- Article

In this article, it talks about how its been 15 years since the "Dont ask, Dont tell" policy was written and it talks about the facts of how the "Dont ask, Dont tell policy was created which I find intersting. In the article it talks about Clintons ideals and why he thought of this law. In the article it says,"It was 15 years ago, Tuesday, that President Clinton rolled out the policy that came to be known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which relaxed the long-standing bar against gay men and women serving in the U.S. military. While the move was initially hailed as progress for the rights of gays in the military". This shows that Clintons ideas were to create freedom for gays and lesbians in the military. But, the fact is that, people have to hide their identity because of this and have to lie about who they really are which could be frusturating in many ways. Some things that the article said that were factual and historical about the "Dont ask, Dont tell" policy is that about 12,000 service members have been booted from the military since the law took effect, including dozens of Arabic speakers whose skills are particularly prized by the military since the advent of the war on terror. While the number discharged for their sexuality has fallen from 1,273 in 2001 to 612 in 2006, Pentagon officials insist they are applying the law as fairly as ever. Gay-rights advocates disagree, suggesting the military — pressed for personnel amid an unpopular war — is willing to ignore sexual orientation when recruiting becomes more difficult. Last May, a CNN poll found that 79 percent of Americans feel that homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the military. This shows that times have changed and that America is just loosing soldiers based on this issue. This is frusturating because gays and lesbians should have the right to serve in the military. In the last sentense of the article it said,"The younger generation doesn't care one bit". This quote I believe is 100% true because there are more rights and its a different generation than the past and the law should finally be changed.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1707545,00.html

Military scaling back 'don't ask, don't tell' Article

This article talked about the "Dont ask, Dont tell" Policy and it talks about how Obama wants to change the law because its the fair and right thing to do. "This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are," Obama said. This shows that Obama believes that it is unjust and unfair for people who are bisexual, lesbian or gay should have the right to be in the military and if they love the country that they live in they should be able to support it by going into the military. I totally agree with what President Obama is saying because I think its the right thing to do. Also in this article, it talked about how it might take years for gay men and lesbians to be fully accepted into the military and that the planning effort will take up about a year. The issues that will be talked about are Among the issues to be addressed by the group: whether gay soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines will face any restrictions on exhibiting their sexual orientation on the job; whether the Pentagon will be obligated to provide for their domestic partners; and whether straight military personnel could be compelled to share quarters with gays. This is interesting and its going to be interesting to see what the final outcome is on all of these subjects. I think that America creates a bigger problem on themselves then they really have to. Also, it talks about how the pentagon is the one in charge in making the rules up for this. In the article it says,"Gay rights groups have also complained that the Pentagon is moving too slowly to ease enforcement of the third-party dismissals, noting that Gates asked the Defense Department lawyers for advice last summer but has not acted since then". This could show that it might take years for gays to actually be allowed into the military and that people arent really taking this situation and issue as serious as they need to be. An interesting fact tat it said in this article that interested me was when the article said," Figures released Monday show that 428 people were discharged from the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines last year for violating the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. The total is about one-third lower than in 2008, when 619 people were discharged". That is a lot of people that the military and army are loosing which is not good.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/01/AR2010020103711.html

U.S. Government Reconsiders "Dont Ask Dont Tell" Policy for the Military- Agreeing View Point

This article talked about how Obama wants to change the law of "Dont ask, Dont tell" policy and they want to change this law because many people are loosing their job to serve in the army so in this article, the view point is on the side where they argree with changing the "Dont ask, dont tell" Policy. The author of the article says,"There is a school of thought which believes should the United States military allow its homosexual members to serve openly it will somehow deteriorate the long standing moral fibers of the organization. I have a hard time with this logic and I have had discussions with various service members regarding the moral codes of the United States military and they are so grossly outdated I don't know if anyone in this day and age can maintain them. You have a younger generation of soldiers trying to live up to codes set by men who existed in a totally different time, place and society". This quote shows that he thinks that the times have changed from the past and there is a younger generation and that the government cant base their opinion on the old generation. I agree with this because its the fair and right thing to do and it is a new generation and many things have changed for the better in the new generation and this also could be a very good thing if it is changed. He also says," I find it ironic that the moral fibers could be eroded in a organization which has been trying currently to curb the pregnancy of its soldiers while deployed. Is there a double standard, where relations between a man and a woman, even if they are married to other people are somehow more valid than those of a same sex couple? I think the people who are fighting the updating of these antiquated policies really need a kick in the pants". This shows that he is agaist the idea of the "Dont Ask, Dont tell" policy because it is unfair and just old fashion. I totally agree with this because its exactly what I believe. He also talks about people should be able to love who ever they want and it shouldnt restrict them from wanting to be part of the army. He says," It wont bankrupt an organization to give people the freedom to love who they wish to love". I agree with this because thats perfectly said as to what i believe. Gays and Lesbians should have the freedom of being able to participate in the military and I think that it will not corrupt or bankrupt the systom. Overall I enjoyed this article because I agreed with the view point and I think that its the right thing to do with letting Gays and Lesbians participate in the military. Overall, if a new law comes to play, maybe in the beginning people will not want to stay in the army but overtime people will get over it.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2661585/us_government_reconsiders_dont_ask_pg2.html?cat=7

Future Of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Stirs Debate Within Military Circles- Oposing View Side

This article was adressing the issue of gays in the military and how the president wants to change the "Dont ask dont tell policy" and it talked about how this women named Ms. Elaine Donnelly(President, Center For Military Readiness)her view point on the issue. She thinks that changing the current policy would hurt the morale of the troops so, she strongly disagrees with changing the law. She says that if this law changes, soldiers will not re-enlist if the law is repealed. She also talks about how this is not a religious issue and she thinks that its very rational and not prejudce to have the "Dont ask, Dont tell policy. Ms. Donelly says, 'The weakest argument going, because of racial separation and prejudice was irrational and it still is. The military took it on head-on because it was irrational and we needed those good soldiers who are already in the military, they just had to attack the prejudice. However, separation of men and women in the military, in areas involving sexual privacy is not only rational, it is desirable and certainly customary in the civilian world as well as the military. The two cannot be equated. They are not the same". This shows that she believes that this is not a prejudgeing issue. I disagree with this because in my opinion, they are discriminating against something. Its not fair for Gays to hide their identity to try to help out this country. Also, Ms. Donnelly says that the "Dont ask dont tell policy keeps things in good order and disipline and i guess, that that makes sense to me as to why she would think that but I feel like she thinks that gays and lesbians are so wrong when really they are not. I feel like our society makes them feel so out of place and it makes me feel symathy for them. The article pretty much talked about how she totally disagreed with changing the law.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123332806

Short Story Analysis- Running by Ellen Howard

I read the short story from the book, Am I Blue? and the short story was called Running by Ellen Howard. This short story was about a girl named Terry. Terry is a teenager and has a sister named Heather. Heather is in college and her parents let to go to Europe. When Heather comes back, she asks her parents if she could bring a friend back with her because her friend is having problems at her house and she got kicked out of her house because of her parents. When the family is at the air port they realize that Heathers friend is a lesbian but, they still accept her into their home. Sheila, Heathers friend, is really sweet and her parents kicked her out of the house beacuse they found of she was a lesbian. This is really sad to hear about because the people that you thought cared the most about you and the people that you could always rely on, kicked you out of the place you live, because you were being honest and true to yourself. This story upset me to see how people, even a persons parents just abandonded their child because of something that he/she couldnt help. Terry starts to get to know Sheila and she really starts to like her because she is different and understands her. In the story, Terry gets upset about her best friend not comming to camp with her because she chose her boyfriend and Sheila was there to comfort her. In the end, I feel like Terry is also a Lesbian because she shows the signs that she doesnt like guys and likes girls. Something that I thought about a lot was the last sentence of the short story. Terry says," And then she shipped through the door, leaving me outside. But the door was open. If I had the courage, I could follow"(101). I think this quote shows that if Terry has the courage to be true to her self she could also follow in Sheilas footsteps.

Where I am so far...

So far, I think I have learned a lot of information on the history of gays and lesbians. I have learned about when the protests started and how it all began. I read about the history in the 1500's and how people were hung if they were gay. I read a lot of different things about the movements of gays. Definietly, the most interesting thing that i have read about so far was that no more than 3 homosexuals were allowed into a bar or a club. I also found it interesting when an article talked about how lesbians were more acceptable than gays in our society which I found sort of confusing. Something that I read that upset me was how people in modern time(now) in Jamaica are getting killed because of their sexuality. I find that wrong and disrespectful to them. It shows people that the world needs to start changing because what they are doing is unfair and unjust. Overall, I think I have a good sense of some of the history of Gays and Lesbians and I would like to keep researching more about my topic to see whats out there.

Gays Live--and Die--in Fear in Jamaica

I read an article about how the country of Jamaica is against Gays and when i was reading this article it upset me to see how unfair they were being to the gay people that live in Jamaica. One of the guys named Sherman that is gay and lives in Jamaica says, "It gets like five, six o'clock, my heart begins to race. I just need to go home, I start to get nervous,"Like many other gays, Sherman won't give his full name for fear of retribution.This is sad because people loose their identity and are afraid to tell people who they really are, based on the sexuality they are. If i was afraid to just walk outside because I was afriad to get abused or even murdered I would feel so low about myself and be devistated. This is probably how the Gay people in Jamaica feel which really upsets me. In the article, it also says that despite the easygoing image propagated by tourist boards, gays and their advocates agree that Jamaica is by far the most hostile island toward homosexuals in the already conservative Caribbean. They say gays, especially those in poor communities, suffer frequent abuse. But they have little recourse because of rampant anti-gay stigma and a sodomy law banning sex between men in Jamaica and 10 other former British colonies in the Caribbean.
In the same article it talks about how for gays, the reality of this enduring hostility is loneliness and fear, and sometimes even murder.Then it goes on to talk about another individual named Andrew, a 36-year-old volunteer for an AIDS education program, said he was driven from the island after his ex-lover was killed for being gay--which police said was just a robbery gone wrong. He moved to the U.K. for several years. Andrew says,"I'm living in fear on a day-to-day basis," he said softly during a recent interview in Kingston. "In the community where my ex-lover was killed, people will say to me when I'm passing on the street, they will make remarks like 'boom-boom-boom' or 'batty boy fi dead.' I don't feel free walking on the streets." These quotes had a big influence on me because I was shocked into what extreme measures people would go because they hated gay people.This article made me realize that something needs to be done, especially in countries like this. McFadden, David. "Gays Live--and Die--in Fear in Jamaica." Miami Herald (Miami, FL) 20 Jul 2009: n.p. SIRS Researcher. Web. 02 February 2010.